Notice of Consequences — Part 1 of 3

Notice of consequences, and their just deserts.


I think Kelly might be right.. somebody in our tightly knit group of resistors is telling lies and giving her what they understand to be reasonable elimination of supposed allies. People the likes of which Kelly declares in a message regarding a withdrawal request from our joint INDEPENDENT ONTARIO ADVOCACY GROUP bank account:

  • 2024APR05 1811ET: If you are trying to donate you can send it to kellycanadian@icloud.com
    Thanks

  • 2024MAR16 1557ET: YOU REALLY NEED TO FUCK OFF .
    You will not like the outcome-
    Fucking psycho
  • 2024FEB21 0114ET: YOU ARE A FUCKING STALKER AND YOU HAVE BEEN CHARGED - LEAVE ME THE FUCK ALONE OR I WILL BE FORCED TO DEAL W THIS PROBLEM ANOTHER WAY
  • 2024FEB20 2110ET: No FUCK OFF
  • 2024JAN26 1729ET: I was ripped off . Bear is going to collect on Monday
  • 2023SEP26 0135ET: I double deposited it - they will notice and fix it - was hoping it would free up 100
  • 2023JUN25 0428ET: There is nothing on it


These are just a few relevant comms regarding somebody trying to rip her off and cause her to do collection with a servant by the name of bear... I think she was talking about the alleged $2500 that was stolen by an idiot who doesn't understand that ANY theft under $5,000 is a Summary Conviction Offence, and that only the people who know the ropes risk facilitating a FRAUD or THEFT OVER $5,000 because these are noted on her website:
https://independentontario.org/breach-of-trust
https://independentontario.org/vilkhov-law/2022/01/21/fraud-under-5000-…

So either somebody is misdirecting our brethren, or we're a bunch of retards like this guy. I mean really, who the fuck would try to con Kelly for over $5,000.. every reasonable criminal understands the threshold of 5K, right?

Geesh.. are we overridden by amateurs, or are they just overly vaccinated against reasonable behaviour?

 

Comments